Systematic Literature Review: Factor For Physical Security And Access Control in Maximun Security Protection

Authors

  • Roslinda Mohamed Bt
  • Hafiza Abas
  • Noor Hafizah Hassan
  • Saiful Adli Ismail

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/oiji2021.9n1.5

Keywords:

Keywords: physical security, access control, security awareness, security standard policy, systematic literature review.

Abstract

Physical security and access control as one of the installations should be upgraded to confirm the security and readiness of the asset belong to the group to continue safely. As the quick development in technology offers a boundless defence level for physical security and access control in the office, every organization must offer a passable budget pertinent to the transformation of the world today.  Through a very humane approach of natural surveillance, access control, maintenance, and reinforcements of territory, this strategy will contribute to the field of physical security as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the features that regulate taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum were identified and analysed. The findings have revealed that five categories of features can be used to study the taking for perimeter protection and access control in maximum security protection: physical security; access control; security standard and policy; security awareness program and security training and security protection. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was accepted since it uses a more rigorous and well-defined method to swotting the study indication pertinent to the study. Initially, 62 papers were retrieved by a manual search in six databases and 17 primary studies were finally included. Consequently, 5 factors education.

 

Downloads

Published

2021-06-26

How to Cite

Mohamed, R., Abas, H., Hassan, N. H., & Ismail, S. A. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Factor For Physical Security And Access Control in Maximun Security Protection. Open International Journal of Informatics, 9(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.11113/oiji2021.9n1.5